France, a country that once prided itself on being the beating heart of European civilisation, appears today to be gripped by a malaise deeper than at any time in recent memory.
The latest Fractures Françaises survey — an annual barometer of national mood conducted for Le Monde by Ipsos, Cevipof, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation, and the Institut Montaigne — has painted a stark portrait of a nation losing faith in itself.
The numbers are nothing short of alarming. Fully 90 per cent of French respondents believe their country is in decline, a three-point rise from last year and the highest level of national pessimism recorded since 2014. It is not merely a passing mood but a structural despair that has settled into the national psyche — a belief that the France of cultural grandeur, global influence, and social cohesion has given way to something fragmented, uncertain, and disillusioned.
This sense of exhaustion now runs so deep that even events which might once have united the country — such as the justice system’s pursuit of the powerful or public outcry over crime — have instead become symptoms of perceived decay. The recent break-in at the Louvre, or the imprisonment of former president Nicolas Sarkozy, have not been seen as expressions of a strong state or functioning institutions, but as proof of institutional failure, moral collapse, and political impotence.
At the centre of this gathering storm stands Emmanuel Macron, the self-styled reformer who once promised to rejuvenate the Republic. His early rhetoric — of modernisation, efficiency, and Europe-first idealism — now rings hollow in a country that sees its living standards eroding and its streets more divided than ever. The President’s conviction that his mandate gives him the moral and constitutional authority to impose unpopular reforms, while simultaneously chastising the public for their discontent, has backfired spectacularly.
To many French citizens, Macron’s aloof technocratic style epitomises everything that has gone wrong with the governing class. His infamous comment during the Yellow Vest protests that some French people “resist progress” still stings. To the disenchanted working class and struggling provincial towns, he has become a symbol not of national renewal, but of a detached Parisian elite indifferent to the economic stagnation and social unease festering beyond the capital’s périphérique.
The Fractures Françaises data underscores this divide. Distrust toward members of parliament has reached record levels, with politicians ranking below journalists, bankers, and even social media influencers in public esteem. This institutional collapse of confidence is not merely about individual scandals or corruption — though there have been plenty of those — but about a deeper belief that France’s ruling system no longer serves its people.
The Allure of the Far Right
Into this breach has stepped Marine Le Pen, whose National Rally (RN) has adroitly channelled the country’s despair into a potent narrative of betrayal and renewal. Her message is simple, emotive, and ruthlessly effective: that France has been humiliated by weak leaders, undermined by uncontrolled immigration, and hollowed out by a globalised elite that values Brussels and Berlin more than Marseille or Lyon.
For a public steeped in gloom, such clarity holds undeniable appeal. Polls now suggest that if parliamentary elections were held tomorrow, the RN would dominate — comfortably outpacing both Macron’s centrist Renaissance party and the fragmented left. Even among voters who remain wary of Le Pen’s past, the idea of a “patriotic correction” has gained legitimacy.
It is, of course, a familiar pattern in Western politics. America’s Donald Trump and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni have both ridden similar waves of resentment — appealing to those who feel culturally sidelined, economically trapped, and morally judged by the new progressive order. In France, the same forces are at work. Le Pen’s strength lies not just in her anti-immigration rhetoric but in her emotional alignment with a nation that feels sneered at by its rulers.
France’s Identity Crisis
What lies beneath this despair is not only economic anxiety, though that plays its part, but a profound identity crisis. The idea of “la France éternelle” — a nation confident in its culture, its secularism, and its mission civilisatrice — has been eroded by years of social fragmentation. The Republic that once prided itself on integrating diverse communities now finds itself torn between competing visions of what it means to be French.
Debates over immigration, secularism, and Islam’s place in public life have hardened into a permanent cultural trench war. Rural France feels abandoned by Paris. The banlieues feel stigmatised and alienated. The middle class, squeezed by taxes and inflation, no longer trusts either the right or the left to offer solutions.
The unedifying sight of a former President being sent to the cells in front of the world’s press is hardly likely to reassure the average Frenchman of the stability of the nation either.
What emerges is a society fatigued by perpetual crisis — economic, political, and moral. When 90 per cent of citizens declare their country to be in decline, it is not simply an economic verdict but a metaphysical one: a belief that the Republic has lost its way, its pride, and perhaps even its soul.
Decline or Renewal?
Yet France, for all its gloom, has faced such moments before. The Fractures Françaises survey hints that a small but significant portion of respondents believe the decline is not irreversible. History supports their instinct: the French state, for all its dysfunction, remains among the most durable in Europe. Its institutions — from the Conseil d’État to the Constitutional Council — still function with a degree of seriousness and independence unmatched in many democracies.
The challenge is whether the country’s political class can once again bridge the widening gap between the people and the Republic. Macron’s final years in office are unlikely to heal this fracture. His legitimacy is spent, and his chosen successor — whoever that may be — will inherit a political landscape dominated by distrust and fragmentation.
But neither is Le Pen’s rise a guaranteed panacea. Her ability to win an election may not translate into an ability to govern a divided nation or manage France’s vast and fractious bureaucracy. Her populism, though electorally effective, could collapse under the weight of economic reality — as has happened to many far-right leaders once in power.
France thus stands at a crossroads familiar to great nations in moments of fatigue. It can succumb to cynicism, allowing national self-doubt to curdle into political extremism and cultural bitterness. Or it can reimagine its purpose — reviving confidence not through nostalgia or scapegoating, but through tangible reform and civic renewal.
That will require leadership of a kind currently absent from its politics. Macron’s hauteur and Le Pen’s populism offer mirror images of the same dysfunction: one too detached, the other too reckless. What France needs is a figure capable of restoring trust — not by promising greatness, but by making competence and accountability fashionable again.
For now, however, the mood remains bleak. France is weary, suspicious, and adrift — a Republic still standing, but unsure of why. Whether this exhaustion ends in renewal or in rupture may well define Europe’s political future as much as France’s own.
Click here for more News & Current Affairs at EU Today
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
