In a scandal that casts a long and unsettling shadow over the final days of Conservative rule, Craig Williams, former Tory MP and parliamentary aide to ex-prime minister Rishi Sunak, appeared in court on Friday accused of cheating by placing bets on the date of the 2024 general election.
The allegations, tied to confidential insider knowledge from the heart of government, have set the stage for one of the most politically sensitive criminal cases in recent memory.
Wearing a crisp black suit and tie, Williams, 40, stood in the dock of Southwark Crown Court with the bearing of a man unaccustomed to the ignominy of criminal proceedings. Yet there he was — not as a lawmaker, but as a defendant in a case that has already drawn comparisons to the expenses scandal for its potential to damage trust in Britain’s political class.
Williams, who served as the MP for Montgomeryshire until his defeat in the July 2024 election, faces four charges: one of cheating at gambling, and three counts of assisting or enabling others to do the same. He is among 15 defendants — including Conservative officials, political advisers, and a former police officer — accused of using inside information about the election date to place bets for personal gain.
The case, codenamed “Operation Scott” by the Gambling Commission, focuses on a series of wagers placed in the weeks leading up to the surprise election announcement. Prosecutors allege that confidential information, discussed in strategic planning meetings at Downing Street and Conservative Campaign Headquarters, was used unlawfully to secure financial advantage.
Inside the Betting Ring
At the core of the investigation is the charge that Williams and his co-defendants exploited insider access to the most sensitive political timetable in the country. While the general public was left to speculate, Downing Street insiders were — allegedly — putting their money where their knowledge lay.
Sam Stein KC, prosecuting on behalf of the Gambling Commission, told an earlier hearing: “Operation Scott was an investigation launched into politicians and employees of the Conservative Party, and a former police officer… who had placed bets on the date of the 2024 general election with the benefit of confidential or insider information as to when that date might be. The prosecution says that placing bets with inside information is a criminal offence — namely, cheating.”
Williams, formerly parliamentary private secretary to Mr Sunak, was closer to the centre of power than most. As PPS, he was expected to act as a conduit between the Prime Minister and MPs — a position that required discretion and integrity. Now, prosecutors argue, he used that access to profit from private knowledge.
The scandal also implicates Russell George, a former Conservative member of the Senedd, and Thomas James, the suspended director of the Welsh Conservatives. Both have pleaded not guilty. Williams, for now, has not indicated a plea. His legal team is expected to submit an application to dismiss the charges in January next year.
Rishi Sunak’s Involvement
While not accused of wrongdoing, Mr Sunak has submitted a witness statement to the court, confirming he had made clear internally that an election would occur in the second half of the year — but did not disclose the exact date. This nuance may prove vital to the prosecution’s case. If it can be shown that Williams or others had access to more specific information, or passed it on, the charges may stand.
However, defence lawyers are expected to argue that mere proximity to power does not equate to actionable insider knowledge — especially in Westminster, where speculation and leaks are often part of the landscape.
Two Trials, Years of Uncertainty
Due to the number of defendants and the complexity of the case, the court has scheduled two separate trials. The first is to begin on 6 September 2027, and the second — which will include Mr Williams — is slated for 3 January 2028. That means some of those accused may wait nearly four years from the alleged offence before facing a jury.
The delay is a reminder not only of the overloaded state of the criminal justice system but also of the grinding pace at which political scandals unfold in the courtroom. For now, Williams remains innocent in the eyes of the law. But politically, the damage is already done.
A Wider Crisis of Trust
The affair raises uncomfortable questions for the Conservative Party — already ejected from office in a historic landslide — and for Parliament as an institution. The notion that politicians may have been betting on an election date they helped decide is corrosive to public confidence, particularly when viewed against the backdrop of recent scandals over lobbying, PPE contracts, and second jobs.
This case is different in scale but not in spirit. It reinforces the perception that those in power often play by their own rules, and that Westminster is a closed circle where access and advantage go hand in hand.
For Labour, now in government, the temptation to cast this as emblematic of a broken system will be irresistible. For the Conservatives, it is a fresh embarrassment they can ill afford as they attempt to rebuild in opposition.
The British public — no stranger to political theatre — will watch closely as this saga unfolds. But whatever the outcome in court, the spectacle of former MPs and party officials in the dock over gambling offences will only deepen the cynicism that already hangs over our politics.
As one senior Conservative remarked privately: “It’s not just about a few stupid bets. It’s about the message it sends — that for some in the party, public service became a game of personal gain. And the country lost.”
Main Image: — https://members-api.parliament.uk/api/Members/4438/Portrait?cropType=ThreeFour
