By any measure, £400 million a month is a colossal sum of money. Yet that is roughly what the British taxpayer is currently spending to house, feed and support illegal migrants and asylum seekers awaiting decisions on their claims.
While politicians squabble and civil servants issue bureaucratic reassurances, it is nurses, builders, shop workers and lorry drivers who ultimately foot the bill. The public is taxed to the hilt, services are stretched to breaking point — and still, the money pours out.
The raw numbers are staggering. In the 2023–24 financial year, the UK spent around £4.7 billion on asylum support. Around £3.1 billion of that went on hotels alone. Roughly 100,000 people are currently being accommodated by the Home Office. On average, each individual costs £3,900 per month, including food, security and basic services.
This is not a temporary crisis; it has become a standing charge on the public finances. Month after month, the Treasury signs off cheques worth almost half a billion pounds to maintain what has effectively become a parallel welfare system for those who have entered the country illegally or are waiting years for their claims to be processed.
That money does not appear out of thin air. It comes from the taxes of working Britons: income tax, VAT, National Insurance, fuel duties, and council tax. Every payslip, every shopping bill, every fuel fill-up contributes to this pot. And as the state struggles to contain costs elsewhere, it is ordinary workers who feel the pinch.
The Workers Carry the Burden
At a time when working families are grappling with rising mortgages, higher energy bills, and a relentless tax burden, the migration bill is politically explosive. Imagine what £400 million a month could fund: new hospitals, extra police officers, teacher pay rises, or desperately needed infrastructure investment. Instead, it is being diverted into hotel rooms, private security contracts, and administrative overheads. The government even advertises the benefits available on its website.
For many, the contrast is bitter. Pensioners waiting months for GP appointments as the NHS is over-loaded , parents unable to secure special educational support for their children, or commuters stuck on crumbling transport networks see a government willing to spend billions on those who have not contributed a penny to the system. It is not hard to see why resentment is growing.
Britain’s tax burden is already at a 70-year high. Workers are paying more, yet public services deliver less. In that context, a policy that directs £400–450 million every month towards housing and supporting illegal migrants is not just a fiscal problem; it is a profound moral and political question. Why should British workers be expected to shoulder the costs of a broken immigration system they did not design and which successive governments have failed to fix?
A System Beyond Control
The uncomfortable truth is that the current situation is the result of political failure on multiple fronts. The surge in small boat crossings over the past five years has overwhelmed the existing asylum infrastructure. Instead of building dedicated reception centres or speeding up claim processing, the government resorted to hotels as a stopgap. That temporary fix has now ossified into a system costing billions annually.
Attempts to use military bases or barges have met with legal challenges, local opposition, or bureaucratic paralysis. Asylum processing times have ballooned, leaving tens of thousands in limbo. While cases crawl through the system, taxpayers continue to foot the bill. Meanwhile, each month of delay means more expense, more resentment, and more strain on public services.
Health, Housing and Schools Under Pressure
The financial costs go beyond accommodation. Public services — especially the NHS — are absorbing additional pressures. Even older Department of Health estimates put the annual cost of NHS services for irregular migrants at around £570 per person. Scaled up, and adjusted for today’s population and costs, the figure is significant.
Schools and local authorities in areas with high numbers of arrivals are stretched. Housing lists grow longer, with British families often waiting years for social housing, while entire hotels are block-booked for migrants. It is not “xenophobic” to point this out; it is simple arithmetic. Every resource is finite. When money and services are diverted in one direction, something else goes without.
The Political Betrayal
For decades, politicians have made promises to get migration “under control”. Successive governments have failed. What has changed is the cost. In an era of tight budgets and high taxation, these sums are no longer peripheral — they are politically central.
Ministers frequently talk tough, but the figures tell their own story. The Rwanda plan, hailed as a deterrent, remains bogged down in legal and political wrangling. Meanwhile, the monthly hotel bill continues to pile up. Voters are entitled to ask: if the Government can’t even reduce this basic cost, what confidence can anyone have in its wider migration strategy?
Other nations have shown that decisive policy can change the equation. Some European states have created large reception centres outside cities, slashing hotel use. Australia’s offshore processing model, controversial though it is, demonstrated that if illegal entry routes are deterred effectively, costs can be brought under control.
Britain, by contrast, has been paralysed — caught between moral posturing, legal roadblocks, and administrative inertia. The result is the worst of all worlds: high numbers arriving, astronomical costs, slow processing, and mounting public anger.
Workers Deserve Better
Britain’s workforce is the engine of the nation. It is their taxes that sustain public services, their labour that drives the economy, and their contributions that keep the country afloat. Yet in the migration debate, their interests are often ignored. Policies are framed around international obligations, legal complexities, or diplomatic considerations — rarely around the basic question of fairness to those who pay for it all.
It is not “hardline” to demand that public money be spent responsibly. It is common sense. A nation that cannot control its borders and cannot manage its migration system ends up transferring the costs of its failure onto those least able to absorb them.
Political Consequences: Farage’s Moment?
If the Government continues to appear paralysed — unable to control its borders, reduce the migration bill, or protect the interests of ordinary workers — the political fallout will be profound. Already, frustration is mounting among voters who feel betrayed by both major parties. Conservatives are seen as weak on enforcement and unable to manage the fiscal burden; Labour is viewed as ideologically committed to open borders at the taxpayer’s expense.
In this vacuum, Nigel Farage and his Reform UK party are finding fertile ground. Their message is blunt, clear, and unflinching: control the borders, cut the costs, and put British taxpayers first. Unlike mainstream politicians, Farage frames the migration crisis in terms of fairness and fiscal responsibility, directly appealing to those who see the £400 million monthly drain as a personal insult.
If the situation persists — with hotels still hosting tens of thousands of migrants, public services under pressure, and no credible solution from Westminster — it is not inconceivable that Reform UK could position itself as Britain’s next government. Whether or not voters embrace Farage fully, the political landscape is shifting, and the migration bill is central to that transformation.
Time for a Reckoning
The £400 million monthly migration bill is more than a line in the budget. It is a symbol of governmental drift and misplaced priorities. Britain cannot continue to ask its workers to pay more, receive less, and watch billions flow into a broken system with no end in sight.
The arithmetic is clear. The politics are even clearer. Those who ignore this reality do so at their peril — and for Nigel Farage, that peril may well be his opportunity. The question now is whether the ruling parties will act before public patience runs out, or whether Reform UK will be the political vehicle that finally forces a reckoning with the cost of uncontrolled migration.
Britain’s workers deserve better. They deserve borders that are secure, services that function, and taxes that are spent responsibly. If Westminster cannot deliver that, the voters may have little choice but to look elsewhere.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
READ ALSO: BRITAIN HOSTS THE LARGEST NUMBER OF ILLEGAL MIGRANTS IN EUROPE, STUDY FINDS
Britain is home to more illegal migrants than any other European country, according to a recent study conducted by Oxford University researchers.
The term “illegal migrants” encompasses several groups: individuals who have overstayed their visas, failed asylum seekers who have evaded deportation, and those who have entered the country illegally, often through small boat crossings across the English Channel.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click here for more News & Current Affairs at EU Today
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
