As Denmark assumes the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has delivered a stark warning to the European Parliament: Europe must prepare to defend itself independently by 2030.
In a wide-ranging speech in Strasbourg on 8 July, Frederiksen outlined a vision of strategic urgency, linking rearmament with broader European resilience across defence, climate, migration, and economic competitiveness.
Speaking against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical risk, Frederiksen stated that Europe is now facing its greatest security challenge since the 1940s. “Russia’s military rearming means they could within two to five years pose a credible military threat to Europe and NATO,” she told MEPs, citing not only the Kremlin’s actions in Ukraine but also growing ties between Moscow, North Korea, Iran, and China.
The Danish leader’s speech, described by some observers as a rallying cry, marked the opening of Denmark’s six-month term at the helm of the EU Council. Her remarks emphasised two overarching priorities: securing Europe, and making it greener and more competitive.
Rearmament by 2030: Strategic Imperative or Political Aspiration?
Frederiksen echoed recent warnings from NATO leaders and European Commission officials that existing efforts are insufficient to meet the continent’s emerging threats. “Cutting our defence spending in the past 30 years was a huge mistake, and we must never repeat it,” she said. Her call to arms centres on the goal of a fully capable European defence posture by the end of the decade.
However, the practical path to that objective remains uncertain. The EU’s “Readiness 2030” initiative, supported by a proposed €150 billion loan facility, aims to bolster joint procurement of weapons systems, enhance interoperability, and increase industrial output. The scheme also includes a “national escape clause” for 15 member states, allowing them to exceed fiscal constraints in order to increase defence investment.
Nonetheless, the broader NATO defence spending benchmark — 5% of GDP by 2035 — is already viewed as unrealistic by several EU governments. Spain has dismissed the figure as excessive, Belgium has raised doubts about its feasibility, and Slovenia is reportedly considering a referendum on the matter.
European defence industries continue to face significant structural and financial hurdles. Industry leaders have argued that without long-term procurement commitments from governments, firms are unwilling to expand production capacity or invest in new facilities. “You cannot expect industry to invest in production capacity if you don’t have long-term orders,” said Joachim Finkielman, director of Danish Defence and Security Industries.
Ukraine: Europe’s Defence Laboratory
Frederiksen placed particular emphasis on Ukraine’s wartime defence innovation, urging member states to draw lessons from Kyiv’s ability to rapidly produce drones, ammunition and other materiel. “They have established an impressive defence industry while fighting a war. It is quite remarkable,” she stated.
She called for closer integration between EU and Ukrainian defence industries, characterising ongoing military support for Ukraine not as charity, but as “a direct defence of Europe, our life and our freedom.” Further sanctions against Russia, particularly a complete halt to imports of Russian gas, also form part of her strategy.
Security Beyond Arms
While defence dominated the address, Frederiksen also highlighted migration as a key security concern, pointing to public discontent expressed during the 2024 European Parliament elections. She pledged to strengthen the EU’s external borders, enhance returns, and push for reforms aimed at stemming irregular migration. She also accused Russia of weaponising migration flows along the eastern flank of the EU.
“These are not fringe positions,” Frederiksen said. “What has been mainstream among our populations for years is now mainstream among many politicians as well.”
Economic and Climate Resilience
Alongside security, the Danish presidency is pursuing regulatory simplification, increased innovation capacity, and reduced energy dependency. Frederiksen warned that Europe is falling behind economically due to excessive regulation, high energy costs, and a shrinking workforce.
The presidency’s priorities include reducing administrative burdens, reforming EU budget structures to allow greater flexibility, and pursuing new trade agreements to secure access to critical raw materials. “We need to boost our ability to innovate, develop, and produce the technologies of tomorrow — and we need to do it with urgency,” she said.
Climate remains central to the EU’s long-term strategy. Frederiksen called for agreement on new 2040 climate targets and reaffirmed the need for a just green transition, emphasising the link between environmental policy and economic strength.
“Europe Must Rise Again”
Throughout her address, Frederiksen returned to a theme of unity in adversity. Quoting Jean Monnet — “Anything is possible in exceptional moments as long as you are ready” — she stressed that the current moment demands not incremental adjustment but systemic change.
“Europe is more than the sum of its parts,” she concluded. “We are an idea — built on democracy, freedom, and common sense. Now is the time to stand up for ourselves, and to defend our way of life together.”
Whether Europe can meet Frederiksen’s call within the five-year horizon remains an open question. The urgency is clear. But without binding commitments, shared industrial planning, and sustained investment, the ambition of a fully rearmed Europe by 2030 risks falling short of its mark.
Read also:
Denmark’s EU Presidency: Charting a Stronger Europe in a Shifting Global Landscape
