Home FEATURED Kremlin’s Hard Line Derails Trump’s Push for Ukraine Peace Deal

Kremlin’s Hard Line Derails Trump’s Push for Ukraine Peace Deal

by EUToday Correspondents
Ukraine

A long-anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin has been abruptly put on hold, exposing the fragile underpinnings of the latest bid to end the war in Ukraine.

The delay, announced by Washington on Tuesday, follows Moscow’s flat rejection of a proposed ceasefire along current frontlines — a move that leaves Western hopes of de-escalation dangling in uncertainty.

What had been billed as a potential diplomatic breakthrough now looks more like a test of wills. Trump, who only last week hinted that he would soon meet Putin in Hungary “to get this thing done,” has been forced to reassess the optics of a high-profile encounter with little chance of immediate results. “I don’t want to have a wasted meeting,” the U.S. president told reporters. “We’ll be notifying you over the next two days,” he added cryptically, suggesting the possibility of further developments behind the scenes.

The Kremlin’s stance remains unyielding. A so-called “non-paper” delivered to Washington over the weekend set out Russia’s position in stark terms: full control of the entire Donbas region — including the remaining parts of Donetsk still held by Ukrainian forces — as a precondition for any ceasefire. It is a maximalist demand that effectively undercuts Trump’s proposal for an immediate freeze of hostilities at current frontlines.

According to U.S. officials familiar with the communique, Moscow’s message was clear: there would be no ceasefire that leaves Russia short of its territorial ambitions. Putin, they said, has little incentive to compromise while Russian troops continue to advance incrementally in eastern Ukraine and domestic pressure on the Kremlin remains contained.

“From Moscow’s perspective, time is on their side,” one senior U.S. official observed. “They see Trump’s ceasefire push as a play for headlines, not a shift in battlefield realities.”

For the White House, the delay of the summit marks a tactical pause rather than a breakdown. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s phone call with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was described by both sides as “productive,” but the absence of an in-person meeting underscores the limited trust that still defines this relationship.

Kirill Dmitriev, a close Putin ally and the Kremlin’s investment envoy, insisted in a social media post that “preparations continue” for a future summit — an attempt to signal continuity rather than collapse. Yet the diplomatic choreography tells its own story: the postponement of a planned meeting between Rubio and Lavrov in Budapest on Thursday, and the absence of any agreed date or venue, point to a wider chill.

The Kremlin, for its part, downplayed expectations, noting that “serious preparation” was required before any new meeting could occur. “The place and timing are less important than the substance,” Lavrov said, referring to implementing “the understandings reached in Alaska” — a nod to the August summit between Trump and Putin that produced more optics than outcomes.

Europe, meanwhile, is pressing Washington to hold firm. In a coordinated message on Tuesday, European leaders urged the United States not to concede ground on the central demand for an immediate ceasefire without preconditions. Several capitals — notably Berlin and Paris — view the existing frontlines as the only realistic basis for future peace talks, but they remain wary of any deal that rewards Russian advances.

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte flew to Washington for urgent consultations with Trump. According to Western officials, Rutte’s mission is to present the “European consensus” on how to approach both a ceasefire and the shape of subsequent peace negotiations. “The European position is that a ceasefire should not mean capitulation,” one diplomat said, adding that allies remain “deeply sceptical” of Russia’s good faith.

For Trump, the challenge is as much political as strategic. Having positioned himself as the leader capable of “ending the war quickly,” he now faces the reality that Putin sees little reason to cooperate. Domestically, Trump’s supporters will applaud his willingness to push for talks; detractors, however, will argue that he risks legitimising Moscow’s territorial claims.

The pause in summit plans may also reflect internal White House debates over how far to go in pursuing a deal that Kyiv itself might reject. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who met Trump at the White House last week, has repeatedly stated that Ukraine will not negotiate away its land. Any sign that Washington is willing to accept new Russian borders could cause friction between the two allies — and strain Trump’s relationship with Congress, where bipartisan support for Ukraine still runs deep.

Yet for all the uncertainty, few believe diplomacy has reached a dead end. “There’s too much at stake for both sides to walk away entirely,” says a senior European security official. “But it’s clear that Russia is not ready to stop fighting — and the U.S. doesn’t want to appear desperate for a deal.”

Behind the public statements, the broader strategic picture looms large. Russia’s rejection of a ceasefire may be intended to signal strength — both to its domestic audience and to Washington. By refusing to freeze the conflict, Putin demonstrates that Moscow remains the dominant actor on the battlefield, not a supplicant in diplomacy.

For Trump, the optics are delicate. A successful summit would burnish his credentials as a peacemaker and consolidate his claim that his administration can “end endless wars.” A failed one, by contrast, would invite criticism that he is being played by Putin. Hence the decision to pause — a move that gives Washington time to reassess leverage, coordinate with Europe, and test whether Moscow’s position can be softened through backchannels.

In the annals of diplomacy, pauses often conceal preparation. Despite the public setback, both sides are keeping lines of communication open. Trump’s team, according to U.S. officials, remains “optimistic but cautious.” Lavrov has left the door ajar, and Dmitriev’s insistence that preparations continue hints at Moscow’s interest in keeping negotiations alive.

For now, however, the momentum has stalled. The grand theatre of a Trump–Putin summit in Budapest has been replaced by the slow grind of diplomacy — phone calls, communiques, and cautious statements.

If there is one lesson from the latest twist, it is that peace in Ukraine remains hostage not to process but to power. Until Moscow sees advantage in compromise, and Washington finds the formula to make that possible, summits will stay on hold — and the war will grind on.

Click here for more News & Current Affairs at EU Today

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

You may also like

Leave a Comment

EU Today brings you the latest news and commentary from across the EU and beyond.

Editors' Picks

Latest Posts