In recent developments in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, Ukrainian forces have launched targeted air strikes on Russian military assets, specifically on a Russian airfield in Morozovsk, Rostov Oblast.
This bold move resulted in the destruction of at least six combat aircraft, including Su-34 and Su-27 jets, crucial components of Russia’s military arsenal.
These air strikes represent a strategic response by Ukrainian forces to the continued aggression and incursions by Russian armed forces. By targeting Russian military assets, particularly those used to deploy munitions on Ukrainian army positions and near the front lines, Ukraine aims to disrupt Russian preparations for further offensives.
The effectiveness of these strikes lies in their ability to hinder Russia’s advance plans. Each disabled aircraft diminishes the capabilities of Russian forces in preparing positions for their advance and undermines the resources of the Russian military-industrial complex.
Moreover, replacing these destroyed aircraft with Ukrainian drone strikes proves to be a challenging task for the Russian military.
However, despite the strategic significance of these actions, there have been perplexing statements from Ukraine’s allies, particularly regarding their disapproval of strikes on Russian territory.
Even US Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasised Washington’s disapproval of Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil facilities.
This raises questions about the rationale behind such statements, especially considering Russia’s prior actions targeting Ukrainian infrastructure since the onset of the conflict.
Furthermore, the notion that Ukraine cannot retaliate against Russian military assets located on its territory due to concerns about escalation is flawed. From Russian legal perspective, there are no distinctions between territories within the Russian Federation and those occupied in Ukraine, since Russia has annexed them.
Thus, targeting Russian military objects in Ukraine is equivalent to targeting them in Russia, as per Russian law.
To effectively deter Russian aggression and potentially bring an end to the conflict, targeting Russian military assets and economy is necessary.
The reluctance of Western powers to take decisive action against Russia has allowed its economy to thrive despite sanctions.
Ukrainian efforts, therefore, offer a more pragmatic and effective approach towards undermining Russian military capabilities and economy.
In conclusion, the Ukrainian strikes on Russian military assets signify a strategic response to Russian aggression.
By disrupting Russian preparations for further offensives and diminishing their military capabilities, Ukraine aims to assert its sovereignty and defend its territory.
The support of Western allies is crucial in ensuring the success of these efforts and ultimately bringing an end to the conflict.
Click here for more News & Current Affairs at EU Today
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
