The ongoing battle in Russia’s Kursk region remains a critical factor in the Kremlin’s strategic decision-making, particularly in the context of potential negotiations with Washington and Donald Trump.
Ukrainian forces continue to hold positions in two districts of the region, creating a significant challenge for Russia’s military and political leadership. Recent Ukrainian strikes on Russian command centres, including those staffed by North Korean officers, have further destabilised Moscow’s position and cast doubt over its ability to control the situation.
The Military Situation
Despite deploying elite airborne divisions and marine brigades, Russia’s offensive in the Kursk region has failed to gain significant ground. Since mid-October 2024, Russian forces have made only marginal territorial advances, while Ukrainian counterattacks have disrupted their momentum.
On 31 January 2025, Ukrainian missile and artillery units launched a coordinated strike on the Russian military command centre in Rylsk, inflicting heavy casualties. President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that the attack had resulted in the loss of key Russian and North Korean officers, describing it as a legitimate military target.
The presence of Ukrainian forces on what Russia considers its own territory is both a military and political setback for the Kremlin. Putin had originally set a deadline of 20 January to eliminate this Ukrainian “bridgehead,” but the failure to achieve this objective has placed additional pressure on his administration.
With the battlefield situation largely unchanged, Russian forces face the growing challenge of sustaining their offensive while dealing with mounting losses.
North Korea’s Role in the Conflict
Russia has increasingly relied on North Korean troops to bolster its depleted ranks in the Kursk region. Ukrainian intelligence estimates that approximately 12,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed, of whom more than 4,000 have already been lost in combat.
The first wave of North Korean forces has been rendered combat ineffective, and Russian commanders are now considering whether to bring in an additional 20,000 to 25,000 troops from Pyongyang.
Despite their numbers, North Korean forces have not proven to be a decisive factor on the battlefield. Reports suggest that at least one North Korean brigade has been destroyed, while two others have suffered heavy casualties.
Several operational challenges have undermined their effectiveness. Language barriers between Russian and North Korean officers have led to communication issues, making coordination difficult.
Many of these troops are unfamiliar with modern drone warfare, and there have been reports of panic and confusion when facing Ukrainian UAV strikes. In some cases, North Korean soldiers have taken their own lives rather than surrender.
Furthermore, adapting to the terrain and the harsh winter conditions has posed additional difficulties, as they have little experience operating in these environments.
For now, it appears that Russian commanders have decided not to send North Korean units into direct combat, suggesting a reassessment of their role.
While Moscow had hoped that these reinforcements would strengthen its offensive capabilities, their limited success on the battlefield raises questions about the viability of further North Korean deployments.
The Political Implications for Moscow
The Kursk region remains a politically sensitive issue for Putin. The continued presence of Ukrainian forces within internationally recognised Russian borders undermines his claims of military success and complicates his efforts to present himself as a strong leader.
The failure to secure the region before potential negotiations with Washington weakens Russia’s diplomatic position, as Putin would prefer to engage in talks from a position of strength.
Beyond the battlefield, the conflict has caused internal unrest within Russia. More than 150,000 residents of Kursk region were forcibly evacuated from their homes, yet many remain in temporary accommodation with inadequate government support.
The Kremlin’s inability to provide housing and assistance has fuelled public frustration, particularly as displaced civilians struggle to rebuild their lives.
Local authorities have faced criticism over their handling of the crisis, further highlighting the Russian state’s broader logistical and administrative shortcomings.
The Sudzha School Bombing Controversy
The recent bombing of a school-turned-shelter in the town of Sudzha has intensified tensions. Moscow initially refrained from assigning blame but later accused Ukrainian forces of deliberately targeting civilians.
Ukrainian officials, however, claim that the explosion was caused by a Russian aerial bomb, possibly due to poor targeting or a miscalculation.
Military analysts argue that forensic investigations could determine the origin of the attack by examining the type of munitions used. If the evidence confirms that a Russian bomb was responsible, it would further erode Moscow’s credibility.
The incident has already triggered a propaganda response from the Kremlin, as officials attempt to shift responsibility onto Ukraine in an effort to control the narrative.
Putin’s Dilemma: Delaying Negotiations?
The situation in Kursk presents Putin with a difficult choice. He had initially sought to eliminate Ukrainian positions in the region before engaging in any diplomatic discussions, believing that a decisive military success would strengthen Russia’s negotiating position. However, with Ukrainian forces still entrenched and recent battlefield losses mounting, Moscow’s options are narrowing.
While Putin may prefer to delay talks in the hope of achieving a breakthrough, continued setbacks could ultimately force him to negotiate from a position of weakness.
The loss of senior officers, the inability to dislodge Ukrainian forces, and the mounting difficulties in sustaining North Korean reinforcements underscore a deepening crisis for the Kremlin.
As the conflict drags on, it remains uncertain whether Moscow can regain control of the Kursk region or if it will continue to serve as a persistent “bone in the throat” for the Kremlin.
Read also:
Russia Deploys ‘Crutch Battalions’ as Wounded Soldiers Are Sent to the Frontline
