Negotiations between Ukrainian and American delegations in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, have resulted in a significant diplomatic development. The talks, aimed at stabilising relations between Kyiv, Washington, and indirectly, Moscow, culminated in a joint statement confirming a 30-day ceasefire agreement. However, its implementation hinges on Russia’s acceptance, which remains uncertain.
Key Developments from Jeddah Talks
The discussions, which lasted multiple rounds over nine hours, were attended by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. Ukraine’s delegation, led by President Volodymyr Zelensky’s representatives, expressed gratitude to President Trump and the US Congress for facilitating the talks.
The joint statement acknowledges Ukraine’s agreement to a temporary ceasefire of 30 days, with the possibility of extension if both sides consent. Crucially, it also reinstates US military aid and intelligence-sharing with Ukraine, which had been suspended following Zelensky’s recent visit to Washington.
Additionally, humanitarian concerns were addressed. The statement highlighted the need for prisoner exchanges, the release of detained civilians, and the return of forcibly displaced Ukrainian children. The involvement of European allies in the peace process was also discussed, reaffirming their role in ensuring long-term security guarantees for Ukraine.
Strategic Implications and US Military Support
One of the most critical aspects of the Jeddah negotiations is the restoration of full US military support for Ukraine. The agreement explicitly states that Washington will resume its provision of security assistance, including the supply of arms and intelligence sharing. This reversal is a key indicator of the Trump administration’s continued commitment to Ukraine’s defence, despite earlier suspensions and debates over the scope of US involvement.
The Saudi royal family, particularly Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, played a critical mediating role in the negotiations, reinforcing Riyadh’s growing influence in global diplomacy. The talks were seen as a test of President Trump’s willingness to re-engage in the Ukraine conflict following his administration’s initial reluctance to align closely with European allies.
Russia’s Calculations: Will Putin Engage or Dismiss?
One of the most pressing questions remains Russia’s stance. Despite the US-Ukraine agreement, Moscow has yet to respond officially. Russian officials, including Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, have not ruled out discussions, but statements from the State Duma suggest that a ceasefire is seen as detrimental to Russia’s strategic position.
Kremlin sources indicate that Russian President Vladimir Putin may delay responding to gauge the political and military impact of the US-Ukraine agreement. Historically, Moscow has rejected temporary truces, arguing that they allow Ukraine to regroup and strengthen its defences. However, with growing economic pressures and prolonged battlefield engagements, Putin may consider a temporary ceasefire as a strategic pause to recalibrate Russia’s military operations.
Alternatively, rejecting the ceasefire outright could lead to increased US support for Ukraine, including additional sanctions and military assistance. US officials, including Rubio, have emphasised that Washington is ready to impose further measures should Moscow refuse to engage in the peace process.
Trump’s Strategy: Balancing Diplomacy with Military Aid
The Jeddah talks have reignited speculation about direct US-Russia negotiations. Reports suggest that White House Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is set to travel to Moscow this week to discuss the ceasefire proposal with Russian officials. Trump’s administration sees this as a test of whether Moscow is willing to enter a broader peace process.
However, there remains uncertainty about how Trump would react if Putin outright rejects the ceasefire. Some analysts suggest that Trump may attempt to increase pressure on Russia by resuming full-scale military support for Ukraine and strengthening sanctions, effectively returning to a more traditional US policy of containment.
If Putin agrees, the ceasefire could lay the groundwork for a long-term settlement, albeit under conditions that remain heavily debated. However, if Russia refuses, Trump will face the challenge of maintaining credibility while dealing with a Kremlin that openly dismisses US-led initiatives. His stance on Ukraine has fluctuated, and a failure to secure Russian cooperation may force him to clarify his long-term strategic objectives.
A Shifting Geopolitical Landscape: Europe’s Growing Role
The ceasefire discussions also come at a time when European leaders are considering alternative security arrangements. French President Emmanuel Macron chaired a meeting of European military chiefs, exploring the possibility of deploying peacekeeping forces in Ukraine—a move opposed by Washington but increasingly favoured in European capitals.
Additionally, reports suggest that Europe is moving towards greater military autonomy, with discussions on establishing its own independent security infrastructure. This reflects growing scepticism about Washington’s long-term commitment and a recognition that Europe may need to take on a more assertive role in regional security.
Read also:
Trump’s Ukraine Dilemma: From Bold Promises to Blame-Shifting
